Cybersecurity testing in India, legal-led and technically elite.
Knowing where your vulnerabilities are — before an attacker finds them — is the most effective security investment you can make. SIRI Law LLP delivers penetration testing, red teaming, AI/LLM security assessments, and managed security services, all backed by legal advisory so findings translate into enforceable remediation and a regulatory-defensible security posture.
Why legal-led testing matters
A pentest report is a technical document until the moment it becomes evidence.
Most penetration testing firms hand over a findings report and consider the engagement complete. What happens to that report next — whether it's privileged, whether it's discoverable in a later dispute, whether its findings trigger a mandatory disclosure obligation — is a legal question a technical vendor generally can't answer, because they aren't structured to.
SIRI Law LLP runs every security engagement as a legal engagement from the scoping call onward. The rules of engagement are set inside a signed legal agreement. Findings are privileged from the reconnaissance phase, not just at final report delivery. And because the same team that ran the test can also advise on the resulting regulatory disclosure obligation — under the DPDP Act, CERT-In's six-hour reporting window, or a sector regulator's rules — there's no gap between "we found something serious" and "here's what you're legally required to do about it."
That shift matters for how AI security testing actually gets scoped in 2026. A prompt-injection test alone no longer covers the risk surface that's producing real damage — agentic systems that browse, call external tools, and act with elevated permissions need their permission boundaries tested as rigorously as their input filtering. SIRI's AI/LLM security testing is built around the current OWASP LLM Top 10 categories, not a static checklist inherited from an earlier framework version.
On the compliance side, one distinction is worth being precise about: CERT-In empanelment is category-specific. A firm empanelled for information security audit services is not automatically empanelled for penetration testing and vulnerability assessment, and a regulator or tender authority will check which category actually applies before accepting an audit report. If a compliance-mandated audit is the driver for your engagement, confirm the specific empanelment category required before scoping the work.
Our services
Explore our full cybersecurity service portfolio
From application-layer testing through full adversary simulation — every engagement scoped individually and run under privilege.
Application Penetration Testing
Web and mobile application vulnerability identification — OWASP-aligned, manually validated, and assessed with business context, not just automated scan output.
- OWASP Top 10 web application coverage
- API and mobile application testing
- Manual validation of automated findings
Cloud Security Testing
AWS, Azure, and GCP misconfiguration detection, IAM review, and realistic attack path analysis across your cloud estate.
- IAM privilege escalation paths
- Misconfiguration and exposure scanning
- Multi-cloud attack path mapping
Network Security Assessments
Internal and external network penetration testing — attack paths, misconfigurations, and credential weaknesses that connect isolated findings into a real breach path.
- Internal and external network testing
- Credential and lateral-movement analysis
- Segmentation and firewall rule review
IoT & Hardware Security
Firmware analysis, hardware interface testing, and embedded system exploitation for connected devices across industrial, medical, and consumer categories.
- Firmware extraction and reverse engineering
- Hardware interface (UART, JTAG, BLE) testing
- Supply chain and OT/ICS risk assessment
AI & LLM Security Testing
Prompt injection, model theft, adversarial attacks, and data poisoning — tested against the current OWASP LLM Top 10 2026 categories, including agentic permission risk.
- Prompt injection and jailbreak testing
- Excessive agency and tool-permission review
- Training data and RAG pipeline security
Red Teaming Services
Full-scope adversary simulation testing people, processes, and technology simultaneously, against specific objectives rather than comprehensive coverage.
- Objective-based adversary simulation
- Detection and response capability testing
- Physical, digital, and social attack vectors
Social Engineering Assessments
Phishing, vishing, physical intrusion, and deepfake-resistance testing — your human layer tested end-to-end, not just simulated with a single email template.
- Phishing and vishing campaign simulation
- Physical intrusion testing
- Deepfake and voice-clone resistance testing
Managed Security Services
Continuous threat monitoring, SIEM management, incident detection, and around-the-clock response for organisations that need ongoing coverage, not a point-in-time test.
- 24/7 SIEM monitoring and alerting
- Threat hunting and incident detection
- Coordinated incident response
AI Adoption Security
Securing your AI transformation before deployment — vendor assessment, data governance review, compliance mapping, and safe rollout planning.
- Third-party AI vendor security assessment
- Data governance and training data review
- Pre-deployment compliance mapping
Our methodology
From scope to remediation, under privilege
Six stages, every one of them documented, and privilege established before testing begins rather than applied retroactively to a finished report.
Scope
Rules of engagement defined. Legal engagement letter signed. Privilege established before any technical work starts.
Recon
OSINT, surface mapping, and architecture analysis. All findings are privileged from this point forward.
Test
Vulnerability identification and active testing against the defined scope, with no production impact.
Exploit
Controlled exploitation to demonstrate real-world impact. Evidence preserved for court proceedings if needed.
Report
Privileged written report with executive and technical findings, CVSS-scored and attorney-reviewed before delivery.
Remediate
Remediation advisory, a re-test to confirm findings are closed, and legal guidance on regulatory disclosure obligations.
Certifications
Our engineers are certified at the highest level
Every credential listed here is held by an active member of the testing team — not a corporate certification the firm cites without practitioners behind it.
Why SIRI
Cybersecurity testing that closes with a legal answer, not just a PDF
SIRI Law LLP is structured so the technical team that finds a vulnerability and the legal team that advises on disclosure obligations are the same firm, under the same privilege, from the first day of testing.
Privileged from day one
Rules of engagement and privilege are established through a signed legal engagement letter before testing begins — not applied retroactively once a report is written. Findings are protected from reconnaissance onward.
Legal + technical, one team
The same engagement that identifies a vulnerability can advise on the resulting CERT-In notification, DPDP Act disclosure obligation, or sector-regulator reporting requirement — without handing off to a separate law firm.
Current frameworks, not static checklists
AI/LLM testing is scoped against the current OWASP LLM Top 10 — including the 2026 edition's sharper focus on agentic permission risk — rather than a methodology frozen at an earlier framework version.
Court-admissible from the start
Where exploitation is used to demonstrate real-world impact, evidence is preserved to a standard that holds up if the matter proceeds to litigation or regulatory investigation — not just internal documentation.
Frequently asked
Cybersecurity testing, answered directly
What is the difference between a penetration test and a red team engagement?
A penetration test is a comprehensive assessment of all identified vulnerabilities within a defined scope and timeframe — reporting everything found. A red team engagement simulates a targeted adversary campaign with specific objectives, such as access to a crown-jewel system, testing whether your detection and response capabilities can identify and stop an attacker. Red team engagements are broader in scope, longer in duration, and focused on adversary objectives rather than comprehensive coverage.
How long does an application penetration test take?
A standard web application penetration test typically takes 5–10 business days for assessment plus 3–5 days for report preparation. Complex applications with extensive API coverage may require 15+ days. Every engagement is scoped before starting to provide an accurate timeline and cost estimate.
Is SIRI Law LLP CERT-In empanelled?
SIRI operates as a CERT-In recognised advisor for breach notification and incident response. CERT-In empanelment is category-specific — a firm empanelled for information security audit services is not automatically empanelled for penetration testing and vulnerability assessment, and vice versa. If a compliance-mandated audit is driving your engagement, confirm the specific empanelment category your regulator or tender requires before scoping the work.
What does the OWASP LLM Top 10 2026 change for AI security testing?
The 2026 edition, published 4 August 2026, kept Prompt Injection and Sensitive Information Disclosure as the top two risks for the third consecutive year, and for the first time incorporated real-world incident data covering 6,639 documented cases alongside practitioner consensus. Excessive Agency rose from sixth to third place, reflecting how agentic AI systems that browse, call tools, and act autonomously have become the primary source of real-world damage. Our AI/LLM security testing scope has been updated accordingly — testing agentic permission boundaries now matters as much as testing prompt injection resistance.
What certifications do your security engineers hold?
Our engineers hold industry-leading certifications including OSCP, CEH, CISM, CCSP, CISA, and cloud-specific credentials across AWS, Azure, and GCP. For AI security assessments, the team maintains current knowledge of the OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
Do you test production systems, or only staging environments?
Scope is agreed with you before testing begins and can cover either, depending on your risk tolerance and change-freeze windows. Active exploitation is controlled to avoid production impact, and any test that could affect availability is flagged and scheduled separately with your team's sign-off.
Ready when you are
Ready to test your security posture?
We begin every engagement with a scoping call — no commitment required.
Related services
Other ways SIRI Law LLP supports your security posture
Visit or contact us
SIRI Law LLP — Hyderabad, India
| Registered office | HITEC City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500081, India |
| Telephone | +91 79819 12046 |
| info@sirilawllp.com | |
| Other offices | New Delhi, India · Austin, Texas, USA · Online worldwide |
| Hours | Mon–Sat, 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM IST · Emergency line 24/7 |