📞 Call Now 💬 WhatsApp 📋 Report
⚖️
SIRI Law LLP
● Typically replies within 30 min
👋 Hi! How can SIRI Law LLP help you today?

We offer expert legal and cybersecurity advisory. Tap below for a confidential chat.
SIRI Law · Now
💬  Start Chat on WhatsApp
SOC 2 Compliance & Audit Readiness in India | SIRI Law LLP
SOC 2 · Trust Services Criteria · Hyderabad, India

SOC 2 compliance & audit readiness — the standard enterprise SaaS customers require.

SOC 2 is the de facto security certification for SaaS and cloud service providers, demonstrating to enterprise customers that your controls safeguard the security, availability, and confidentiality of their data. SIRI Law LLP builds your SOC 2 control framework, evidence programme, and audit readiness from scratch, or optimises and accelerates an existing programme.

2017TSC still current — unchanged since 2022's Points of Focus revision
12–18 moTypical timeline to full SOC 2 Type II
6–12 moType II observation period, once controls are in place
12–18%Reported average fee increase from auditors tightening 2026 AI evidence expectations
The SOC 2 evidence clock
Live tracking · what actually changed vs. what auditors now expect
Standing
2017
AICPA publishes the Trust Services Criteria — Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy. Still the current framework version.
Revised
2022
AICPA issues revised Points of Focus for the 2017 TSC — updated interpretive guidance, not new criteria. Still the current standard.
No new version
2026
The TSC itself remains unchanged — no new AICPA framework version has been issued despite frequent "SOC 2 changed for 2026" marketing claims.
Tightened
2026
Auditor interpretation has shifted substantially — AI governance, model lineage, shadow AI, and agent accountability now routinely tested under existing criteria.
Rising cost
+12–18%
Reported average fee increase from mid-tier and Big Four audit firms as 2026 evidence expectations expand engagement scope.
Risk
Gap exposure
A 2024 or 2025 SOC 2 report may no longer fully satisfy a 2026 enterprise security review, even though the underlying TSC hasn't moved.

Getting "what changed for 2026" right

SOC 2 itself hasn't changed. What auditors expect as evidence has — substantially.

A lot of compliance marketing content claims "SOC 2 changed for 2026." That's imprecise in a way that actually matters for planning your engagement. The AICPA's Trust Services Criteria remain the 2017 version, with the 2022 revised Points of Focus — no new framework version has been issued, and the five categories (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) are unchanged. If a vendor tells you SOC 2 changed, what they almost always mean is that auditor interpretation has shifted, not that the underlying standard was rewritten.

That interpretation shift is real and worth planning for specifically. AI-fluent auditors in 2026 are asking for evidence that traditional SaaS SOC 2 engagements never produced: model lineage documentation (which dataset, code, and approval sits behind a deployed model), prompt and inference logs with PII redaction applied before logging, drift-monitoring output, and vendor risk assessments for every third-party LLM your product calls. Shadow AI — engineers piping company data into unapproved AI tools — is now something auditors actively probe for, and "agent accountability" has become a genuine finding category: when an autonomous agent takes a privileged action attributable to no specific human request, SOC 2's expectation that privileged actions trace to an accountable person is treated as unmet.

Your existing report may not satisfy this year's buyer
Because the framework text hasn't changed, a 2024 or early-2025 SOC 2 Type II report technically remains valid — but expect enterprise security reviews in the second half of 2026 to ask follow-up questions about AI governance and continuous monitoring that an older report simply doesn't address. This is a genuine planning risk: the report itself isn't expired, but the evidentiary bar buyers are now applying to it has moved.

For any organisation building or renewing product with AI features, this means the readiness assessment now needs to explicitly scope AI-specific evidence alongside the traditional Security TSC controls — not as an afterthought bolted on before the audit, but as part of the control framework design from the outset.

What it is and why it matters

The five Trust Services Categories

SOC 2 is an attestation framework developed by the AICPA, assessed by independent CPA firms against the Trust Services Criteria. Security is required; the rest are selected based on your business model.

Required

Security

The Common Criteria — logical access, change management, monitoring, incident response, vendor management. Every SOC 2 report includes this.

Elective

Availability

Typically added by SaaS companies where uptime SLAs are customer commitments.

Elective

Confidentiality

Relevant when you process business-confidential information beyond personal data.

Elective

Processing Integrity

Relevant for transaction processing or financial services platforms.

Elective

Privacy

Relevant when you process personal data — integrated with DPDPA and GDPR compliance in our engagements.

Source: AICPA TSP Section 100, 2017 Trust Services Criteria with 2022 Revised Points of Focus — the current standard as of publication. SOC 2 Type I reports on control design at a point in time; Type II reports on operating effectiveness over a 6–12 month observation period. Enterprise customers almost universally require Type II.

Scope of services

What our engagement covers

The full engagement lifecycle — readiness assessment, control framework design, evidence collection automation, vendor management, penetration testing, and auditor liaison.

01

Readiness Assessment

Gap assessment against applicable TSC categories, Trust Services Category selection advisory, and a realistic timeline to Type I and Type II readiness.

02

Control Framework Design

Policy, procedure, and control mapping — access management, change management and SDLC controls, encryption and data handling, audit log management.

03

Evidence Programme

What to collect, how to automate it, and how to organise it for the audit — including 2026-relevant AI evidence where applicable.

04

Vulnerability & Penetration Testing

TSC-required annual penetration testing programme, conducted by our security team and reported in a format that satisfies SOC 2 auditors.

05

Incident Response & Vendor Management

Incident response policy and procedures, business continuity and availability controls, and a vendor/sub-processor management programme.

06

Privacy TSC — DPDPA/GDPR Integration

Our legal team integrates DPDPA and GDPR obligations directly into the Privacy TSC, avoiding duplicate compliance work across frameworks.

Evidence, not guesswork

SOC 2 vs. ISO 27001 — which one, or both

The two most commonly conflated certifications. Here's the practical difference.

Dimension SOC 2 Type II ISO 27001
Governing body AICPA, assessed by independent CPA firms ISO/IEC, assessed by accredited certification bodies
Primary market recognition US enterprise buyers — typically more recognised European, Indian, and global buyers — more universally understood
Output An attestation report describing controls and testing results A certification against a management system standard
Renewal cycle Type II report covers a 6–12 month period, renewed annually 3-year certification cycle with annual surveillance audits
Overlap Substantial control overlap — many SaaS companies pursue both, sharing evidence and documentation across engagements

Both frameworks address overlapping but not identical requirements. Confirm which combination fits your specific buyer base and market before committing to a dual-certification programme.

What the numbers actually mean

Four figures that frame SOC 2 planning today

12–18 mo
Full Type II timeline

From readiness programme start to a complete Type II report — compressible with mature existing controls.

6–12 mo
Type II observation window

The period over which controls must demonstrably operate, not just exist on paper.

+12–18%
Reported 2026 fee increase

Average audit fee rise reported by mid-tier and Big Four firms as AI evidence scope expands engagements.

5
Trust Services Categories

Security required; Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, and Privacy selected based on your business model.

Our engagement process

How we work, step by step

01

Scoping & Assessment

Gap assessment against the applicable framework, engagement scope definition, and a prioritised remediation roadmap with timeline and effort estimates.

02

Programme Design

Control framework, documentation structure, evidence requirements, and governance processes — tailored to your organisation, including AI-specific evidence where relevant.

03

Implementation Advisory

Working alongside your technical and operational teams to build controls that are practical and auditable, not just theoretically compliant.

04

Internal Audit & Validation

An internal audit or readiness assessment identifying any remaining gaps before the formal certification or attestation process begins.

05

Certification / Attestation Support

Managing auditor queries, providing evidence, and resolving findings on the day of the formal audit or assessment.

06

Post-Certification Advisory

Surveillance audit preparation, change management, and regulatory update advisory once you're certified, including evolving 2026 AI evidence expectations.

Benefits & deliverables

What you get from this engagement

SOC 2 Readiness Report

Detailed gap assessment with control-by-control status, remediation roadmap, and timeline to Type I and Type II.

Control Framework Documentation

Complete documentation library — policies, procedures, control descriptions, and evidence collection guide.

Penetration Test Report

TSC-compliant penetration test report suitable for inclusion in your SOC 2 evidence package.

Type I Readiness Confirmation

Internal pre-audit confirmation that control design satisfies applicable TSC before the CPA firm's assessment.

Type II Observation Support

Advisory throughout the 6–12 month observation period, ensuring controls operate consistently and evidence is collected continuously.

Auditor Liaison

Management of the CPA auditor relationship during fieldwork — responding to queries, providing evidence, and resolving exceptions efficiently.

Integration advantage

Compliance engagements backed by qualified legal counsel

Our compliance engagements ensure your programme satisfies both technical certification requirements and legal obligations under DPDPA, IT Act, and sector-specific regulation.

01 — Precision

We tell you what actually changed

Rather than the flat "SOC 2 changed for 2026" claim, we explain what's genuinely different — auditor interpretation, not the TSC itself — and scope your evidence programme to what auditors are actually testing for now.

02 — Integration

Privacy TSC + DPDPA/GDPR in one workstream

Our legal team integrates DPDPA and GDPR obligations directly into your Privacy TSC scope, avoiding the duplicate compliance work most standalone consultants create.

03 — Technical depth

In-house penetration testing

The TSC-required annual penetration test is conducted by our own security team and reported in a format SOC 2 auditors accept directly, not outsourced to a disconnected vendor.

04 — Credentials

Certified engineers

Our team holds CCSP, CISM, CIPP/E, CEH, OSCP, CISSP, CPENT, and ISO 27001 Lead Auditor credentials — the mix auditors and boards expect from a serious compliance programme.

Frequently asked

SOC 2, answered directly

How long does SOC 2 Type II take?

Achieving SOC 2 Type II typically takes 12 to 18 months from starting the readiness programme — 3 to 6 months to build controls and achieve Type I readiness, then a 6 to 12 month observation period for Type II. Organisations with mature existing controls can compress this timeline significantly. We provide a realistic estimate after the readiness assessment.

Did SOC 2 actually change for 2026, or is that marketing?

The Trust Services Criteria themselves have not changed — they remain the AICPA's 2017 TSC with the 2022 revised Points of Focus, and no new version has been issued. What has genuinely shifted is auditor interpretation: firms are asking harder, more specific questions about AI governance, model lineage, shadow AI usage, and agent accountability than they were even a year ago, and organisations whose last report predates this shift often find their 2024 or 2025 SOC 2 no longer fully satisfies a 2026 enterprise security review. If a vendor tells you "SOC 2 changed," what they usually mean is that what auditors expect as evidence has tightened, not that the underlying framework was rewritten.

Which Trust Services Categories should we include?

Security is mandatory. Availability is typically added by SaaS companies where uptime SLAs are customer commitments. Confidentiality is relevant when you process business-confidential information. Privacy is relevant when you process personal data, and we integrate this with DPDPA and GDPR compliance. Processing Integrity is relevant for transaction processing or financial services platforms. We advise on the right set for your business model.

Can SOC 2 replace our ISO 27001 certification?

For US enterprise customers, SOC 2 Type II is typically more recognised. For European, Indian, and global customers, ISO 27001 is more universally understood. They address overlapping but not identical requirements. Many SaaS companies pursue both. We advise on whether pursuing both is appropriate for your market and on efficient combined implementation.

Do we need to share our SOC 2 report with every customer?

SOC 2 reports are confidential — they are shared under NDA with customers and prospects who require them as part of security review. You control who sees the report. Many companies reference their SOC 2 status publicly, on a trust page or website, while sharing the full report only under NDA.

What AI-specific evidence should we prepare if our product includes AI features?

Model lineage documentation for deployed models, prompt and inference logs with PII redaction applied before logging, drift-monitoring output, and vendor risk assessments for any third-party LLMs your product calls. Auditors also test for shadow AI usage and whether privileged actions taken by autonomous agents can be traced to an accountable person — both increasingly standard findings categories in 2026 audits.

Ready to start your SOC journey?

All engagements begin with a complimentary scoping call.

Let us understand your environment and propose the right approach to SOC 2 Type I, Type II, or a combined ISO 27001 programme.

or call +91 79819 12046 — Mon–Sat, 9 AM – 7 PM IST

Visit or contact us

SIRI Law LLP — Hyderabad, India

Registered officeHITEC City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500081, India
Telephone+91 79819 12046
Emailinfo@sirilawllp.com
Other officesNew Delhi, India · Austin, Texas, USA · Online worldwide
HoursMon–Sat, 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM IST · Emergency line 24/7
© SIRI Law LLP · Hyderabad, Telangana

This page is provided for general informational purposes only. Compliance requirements vary by organisation, sector, and jurisdiction. References to AICPA Trust Services Criteria and 2026 auditor interpretation trends reflect publicly available information as of publication and remain subject to further AICPA guidance; confirm current standards with your CPA auditor before relying on any specific claim. Engagement with SIRI Law LLP requires a formal retainer. This page does not constitute legal advice. SIRI Law LLP is a registered law firm under the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008, practising under the Advocates Act 1961; complaints regarding professional conduct may be directed to the Bar Council of Telangana.

Scroll to Top